![]() ![]() This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. ![]() The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. industry for recurring crewed lunar landing services.” “There will be forthcoming opportunities for the Moon under the agency’s Artemis program, including a call in 2022 to U.S. “In addition to this contract, NASA continues working with multiple American companies to bolster competition and commercial readiness for crewed transportation to the lunar surface,” the agency’s statement reads. “We look forward to hearing from NASA on next steps in the HLS procurement process,” Blue Origin said.įor its part, NASA said the agency will resume work with SpaceX under the Option A HLS contract as soon as possible. ![]() “Returning astronauts safely to the Moon through NASA’s public-private partnership model requires an unprejudiced procurement process alongside sound policy that incorporates redundant systems and promotes competition.”īlue Origin went on to say that it is committed to the success of NASA’s Artemis program and will continue to work with the agency on its current contracts to mature lander designs and develop in-situ resource utilization technology. “Our lawsuit with the Court of Federal Claims highlighted the important safety issues with the Human Landing System procurement process that must still be addressed,” Blue Origin said in a statement following the decision. 18, pending the redaction of any proprietary information in the document. However, the full opinion of the court is not expected to be released until Nov. 4, Judge Richard Hertling dismissed the lawsuit. Court of Federal Claims in August, which the company called, “an attempt to remedy the flaws in the acquisition process found in NASA’s Human Landing System.” In July, the GAO sided with NASA, stating that NASA had “reserved the right to make multiple awards, a single award, or no award at all.”īlue Origin then filed a lawsuit with the U.S. Shortly after the decision, Blue Origin and Dynetics filed a protest with the Government Accountability Office, which prevented NASA from allocating money to SpaceX until the situation was resolved. Blue Origin had bid $5.9 billion while the third company competing for the HLS contract, Dynetics, had bid even higher. However, because of inadequate funding provided by Congress for the program, NASA opted to choose SpaceX as it had the lowest bid. It was hoped NASA would choose two commercial providers for redundancy in the development process in much the same way as was done for the Commercial Crew Program with SpaceX’s Crew Dragon and Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner. In April of this year, NASA awarded SpaceX a contract worth $2.9 billion to build a human-rated Moon lander based on the company’s Starship design, which is currently in development. Credit: Blue OriginĪ United States Court of Federal Claims judge dismissed a lawsuit by Blue Origin versus NASA over the agency’s decision to award the Human Landing System contract solely to SpaceX. ![]() A rendering of the National Team lander design, which is being built by Blue Origin, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin and Draper. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |